# Newcastle MathsJam April 2012 Recap

April’s MathsJam was very enjoyable. We did a bit of arts and crafts, a bit of playing games, and if it had been NBA Jam instead of Maths Jam I would have been entirely on fire because I used up all my IQ points solving some very fun puzzles. Durham were still on their Easter holidays so the attendance was a modest six people. That was just enough for everyone to be doing the same thing at the same time, so we had a good time.

## Sprouts

Eamonn brought in the rules for Sprouts. He and Sarah played a few games and quickly realised that games can’t go on forever, so they set about trying to work out the perfect strategy.

Somebody asked what it means to “solve” a game, because I say that quite a lot. It means describing what happens when both players are playing perfectly, in particular which player wins.

I thought that Sprouts had been completely solved, but according to the wikipedia page and this paper it hasn’t! It also seems that the link between Sprouts and Nim isn’t as straightforward as I thought. Good job I didn’t mention it, then.

Matthew Taylor showed us something to do with integer partitions. I didn’t really understand how it worked, and he didn’t have a proof that it does what he says it does, so maybe he can explain it in the comments.

We answered Katie Steckles’ question about whether we considered ourselves mathematicians. She’s written a very interesting article based on the responses she received, which should be on the Aperiodical soon.

## Hyperbolic spaaaaaaaace!

Prompted by last month’s discussion about games in hyperbolic space, I’ve been collecting all sorts of interesting hyperbolic things. I printed out some heptagons which we glued together to make a model of the

I had also seen a video showing how to make the same model using buckyballs so we had a go at that as well. Steven seemed to be the only person capable of reliably making heptagons, but we got enough together in the end to make this small model. It doesn’t look like much in the photo but it was fantastic to hold and flexed in rather pleasant ways.

I tried to talk about how fibonacci trees have something to do with this tiling but I forgot most of the details. I think I managed to just about get across how every positive integer can be represented uniquely as a sum of non-adjacent fibonacci numbers, aka Zeckendorf’s theorem.

Matthew took the opportunity to make Nessie.

## Wine tasters on a plane

We eventually got bored of playing with models of weird space and looked on twitter for some puzzles from the other MathsJams.

MAN: We’re attempting to prove @aPaulTaylor‘s claim that 219…978, with any number of 9s in the middle, reverses its digits when quadrupled.

— Maths Jam (@MathsJam) April 17, 2012

Click here for the proof. As usual, please try to have a think about it yourself before checking the solution, it’s much better that way.

GLA: 1000 barrels of wine and 10 tasters.1 barrel is poisoned and kills the drinker in 30 days.Can you single out the bad barrel in 31 days?

— Maths Jam (@MathsJam) April 17, 2012

I’ll add another rule that Glasgow didn’t mention, but I think is needed for it to be an interesting puzzle: the poison kills a taster at some point on the 30th day after being drunk, not after an exact number of seconds. So you can’t get a single taster to drink from each barrel in turn and then use a stopwatch on the 30th day to work out which barrel killed him.

Click here for a hint

I thought this problem came from twitter but I can’t find the originating tweet. Whoever brought it up, can you say in the comments where it came from?

*100 passengers are waiting to get on a plane with 100 seats. The first dude gets on, but has forgotten which seat is his, so he picks a seat at random. The rest of the passengers board one by one. If their seat is free, they sit in it, otherwise they pick another free seat at random. *

*What is the probability that the last passenger sits in his assigned seat?*

Click here for the solution, but give this one a proper thinking about first because it’s a good question.

Finally, we played with some rolling cube puzzles from mathpuzzle.com.

The aim is to roll the cube so that you can read the word “Finish” the right way up. You can’t spin the cube on its face, and you can only roll the cube about green edges in contact with the table. They’re sort of like mazes in a bit of the symmetry group of the cube. I had to add some marks to distinguish the green edges because of how bad my eyes are at looking at colours.

That’s it for April’s MathsJam. I thoroughly enjoyed myself yet again and I think everyone else did too. If I’ve missed anything, please mention it in the comments, and I hope I’ll see you next month!

## Comments

## Comments

Andrew

In Manchester, we did the wine-tasting puzzle without the second day of ponce-slaughter. We encoded bits by life or death rather than death on Monday or death on Tuesday.

I suppose you could argue you can’t use the second day as someone could die at 23:59:59 and you’d have to move really fast to keep up. Or use it to moveinto ternary – would that be likely to save any tasters?

Christian Perfect

Oh yes of course, drinking the 1s is redundant.

I think the reaons you’re given the second day is because you can only say someone has survived a day once that day is over.